Direct Injection, Simple and Robust Analysis of Trace-level Bromate and Bromide in Drinking Water by IC with Suppressed Conductivity Detection
Abstract
Bromide is ubiquitously found in drinking water. It is introduced
into source water primarily by contact with bromide-containing
soils or seawater having high bromide content. Bromide is
converted into carcinogenic bromate during ozonation processes
employed in some drinking water and wastewater treatment plants.
Therefore, monitoring of bromate in drinking water and its
precursor bromide in source water is required. The purpose of this
study was to survey bromide and bromate concentrations in
randomly selected bottle waters of various brands and several tap
water samples in the coastal Houston area using a direct-injection
ion chromatography (IC) and a suppressed conductivity system. The
method employs a simple isocratic IC with loop injection with
calculated detection limit of 0.009 µg/L for bromate and 0.028
µg/L for bromide (250-µL sample volume). Allowing the detection
of both species at the µg/L level in drinking water, this method does
not require specialized instrumentation such as two-dimensional
IC, expensive sample preparation, or post-column reactions. The
results show that, whereas bromate remains undetected in all five
tap water samples, there are significant high concentrations of
bromide in the coastal Houston area (294.79 ± 56.97 µg/L). Its link
to potential seawater intrusion need to be further investigated. For
bottle water samples randomly collected, 18.2% (2 out of 11)
showed detectable amount of both bromide and bromate. The
detection of bromate coincides with those bottle water samples
that underwent ozonation treatment. Further sample campaign
with exclusively ozonated bottle water samples (n = 19) showed
100% detection rate for both bromide and bromate. The 99%
confidence intervals were 14.45–37.97 µg/L and 0.32–2.58 µg/L for
bromide and bromate, respectively. The highest level of bromate
among all ozonated bottle water samples was 7.57 µg/L, a
concentration close to the U.S. EPA prescribed limit for drinking
water standard. Regression analysis indicated that although a
positive correlation exists between bromide and bromate
concentrations, such a correlation is not statistically significant.
This finding is not unexpected since a variety of other parameters in
the ozonation process (such as water quality, ozone dose, and time
in addition to bromide concentration) affect the formation of
bromate. Our results strongly suggest that cautions should be
exercised to examine the potential formation of bromate when
source water from coastal zone undergoes ozonation treatment.
Another strong proof of our findings is that all the tap waters
collected were treated in jurisdictions that do not use ozonation for
disinfection. The fact that none of these tap water samples
contained bromate (despite an abundance in bromide) proves our
hypothesis even further.
Institutional Repository URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10657.1/2250
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Developing an Appropriate Staff Mix for Anticoagulation Clinics: Functional Job Analysis Approach
Hailermariam, D.; Shan, Xiaojun; Chung, S. H.; Khasawneh, M. T.; Lukesh, W.; Park, A. M.; Rose, A. (2019)Anticoagulation clinics (ACCs) are specialty clinics that manage patients with blood clotting problems. Since labor costs usually account for a substantial portion of a healthcare organization’s budget, optimizing the ... -
Optimal sample preservation and analysis of CR(VI) in drinking water smaplers by high resolution ion chromatography followed by post column ractioni and UV/Vis detection
Zhang, Carl (2012)A recent study by the Environmental Working Group reported the detection of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) in tap water at 31 out of 35 states investigated in the United States. Even though Cr(III) is an essential element ... -
Sampling and Sampling Strategies for Environmental Analysis
Zhang, Carl (International Journal of Environmental and Analytical Chemistry, 2011)Sampling errors are generally believed to dominate the errors of analytical measurement during the entire environmental data acquisition process. Unfortunately, environmental sampling errors are hardly quantified and ...